Intimidation and an Illegal End-run Around the Brown Act
This is a gross violation of the Brown Act and against the law. There is no existing litigation, it is simply not true. This is an attempt to hold a closed session discussion on a topic of public interest that does not qualify for a closed session.
In addition, we have never seen a person’s name listed on a litigation agenda item. Is MDUSD so bold as to try to intimidate a community member in this way? Regardless this is against the law.
MDUSD should be required to retract Agenda Item 3.2 and report a full account of the private session discussion into the minutes of the open session meeting.
On May 8, 2017 MDUSD listed the same Agenda Item and again held an illegal closed session discussion.